I seem to have lost the draft of my first blog so I will try again.
In the first video " Philosophy of the Arts " there was a robust discussion of what already was, art who's visual or aesthetic value was being debated had existed before the discussion. The most famous of thinkers debated what was aesthetic in philosophical form, I agreed with the neo-classical architech Leonardo Alberta that aesthetic appeal is based in symmetry, proportion and order. I agree with the 18th century English assertion by Hutchinson that art is inate, not with the notion that it can only be understood by those with proper training or knowledge.
Ramachandran supports the opinion of Alberta with very simple explanations and examples he was also very entertaining and so kept mine and the audiences attention and was able to get the message across.
No comments:
Post a Comment